This is the first in a series of posts I plan to write during my creative coaching network with @loswhit. After each group session I’m going to post some of my thoughts, insights, and takeaways from our discussion. Hopefully some of it might come in handy!
Yesterday I had my first creative coaching session with Carlos Whitaker and eight other church creative types. It was what you would expect from a first meeting of 10 artists–exciting and at the same time a little strange. Los kept referring to it as “the first date”–a little awkward, everyone wearing their most trendy t-shirt, etc. All in all though it was a good beginning.
Going Backward…
We talked a lot about innovation–how these days, being innovative equates to “cool” for most churches. He challenged us to think instead about going “backward” to get innovative. Maybe instead of playing the latest Hillsong tune, the most innovative thing you can do right now in your church is to sing hymns or go sit at the organ. (Think about that for a second.)
In thinking about going “backward” and rooting creativity in history and tradition to find innovation, I thought of two specific ways last year at Grace that we attempted to do just that:
- a year ago during Advent, I remixed a gregorian chant of the Magnificat from the 15th century with a back beat in Ableton and our band and wrote new lyrics to go along with it for the congregation to sing. We had this mix of sounds with the gregorian chant in latin providing the foundation for which the congregation sang the translation in English over.
- last month I took some time to teach my congregation some history about hymns–that lyrics and tune used to be separated and that, for instance, the tune we know as Amazing Grace actually wasn’t the original tune. I then told them about the modern hymns movement, how the idea was to capture the spirit of generations before by pairing timeless lyrics with a new melody line and fresh chords. I then introduced Great is Thy Faithfulness, which I had rewritten with a new meter, chords, and melody.
Both of these moments were creative highlights for us, and two of the elements that most effectively drew people into worship over the last 12 months.
The Problem With Innovation…
One of the related questions that was on our agenda but that we didn’t talk about was What problems do you see with the church desiring to seek after innovation and relevance?
The question reminded me of a Tim Keller article I recently read where he eloquently makes the argument for relavant, evangelistic worship that is grounded in tradition. Here’s a great quote detailing some of the pitfalls with many worship leaders’ (including sometimes my own!) “modern worship” worldview:
First, some popular music does have severe limitations for worship. Critics of popular culture argue that much of it is the product of mass-produced commercial interests. As such, it is often marked by sentimentality, a lack of artistry, sameness, and individualism in a way that traditional folk art was not.
Second, when we ignore historic tradition we break our solidarity with Christians of the past. Part of the richness of our identity as Christians is that we are saved into a historic people. An unwillingness to consult tradition is not in keeping with either Christian humility or Christian community. Nor is it a thoughtful response to the post-modern rootlessness which now leads so many to seek connection to ancient ways and peoples.
Finally, any worship that is strictly contemporary will become ‘dated’ very, very quickly. Also, it will necessarily be gauged to a very narrow ‘market niche.’ When Peter Wagner says we should ‘plug in’ to contemporary culture, which contemporary culture does he mean? White, black, Latin, urban, suburban, ‘Boomer,’ or ‘GenX’ contemporary culture? Just ten years ago, Willow Creek’s contemporary services were considered to be ‘cutting edge.’ Today, most younger adults find them dated and ‘hokey.’
Hidden (but not well!) in the arguments of contemporary worship enthusiasts is the assumption that culture is basically neutral. Thus there is no reason why we cannot wholly adapt our worship to any particular cultural form. But worship that is not rooted in any particular historic tradition will often lack the critical distance to critique and avoid the excesses and distorted sinful elements of the particular surrounding, present culture. For example, how can we harness contemporary Western culture’s accessibility and frankness, but not its individualism and psychologizing of moral problems?
Go back and read that quote again. Honestly, the first time I read through that I was wrecked because I knew that in pursuing innovation and relevance, I’d often discarded the foundation that comes from being connected to generation upon generation of faithful worshipers who have come before.
In my hurry to reject the typical traditional church world view that one particular era of church history was a golden age and pinnacle of corporate worship (which incidentally is also false), I had neglected the untold richness that comes from rooting contemporary expressions of worship in the context of historical tradition.
There is something very worshipful about pointing out that the God of the universe that we are worshiping on Sunday morning is the same God whom people worshiped a hundred years ago, or a thousand years ago. There’s a sense of connection to the story that God is writing that will draw people into worship if you take the time to unite your culture with what has come before in your service.
And in this day and age, that’s actually a pretty innovative thought.
Filed under: Creatives | No Comments »